Just saw an AD for Palin

[Compu Doc]

And if you say it enough people might actually start believing it. Not this person though.

Funny how these republicans mentioned in this article are backed by the tea party which is NOT A THIRD PARTY.

Try as you might you cannot convince me it is a third party or any other person who is smart.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...l-spending.php

[TxMusky]

WTF is wrong with 2 sets of people having some of the same ideas and principles? Is there some law against this I missed? Who cares....I'm pretty sure that neither one of them need your silly approval to run anything. You and the rest of the slackers are going to see what happens when you piss enough good people off. We have been taken advantage of for long enough and since that prick Obozo couldnt hold his word and the Repubs are almost as useless, then another group will step in and fill the bill.

Who cares what the name is as long as the message that the masses want to back is what they are saying. Obama promised the junkies and meatheads a whole pack of lies and you morons fell for it, hook line and sinker. You claim to be so smart, but the math that was needed to figure all that was promised vs all that could be accomplished was way off and could never add up. The lying bastards got caught, and couldnt make the majority of the people fall for the same BS and now will pay for it with their jobs. Too bad our grandchildren will also pay for the stupidity of their parents and grandparents who were not smart enough to figure out that they were being duped.

Dont worry tho, the ones who have figured it out and the ones who saw it coming all along are working tirelessly to rectify the stupidity of 2 years ago.

[Tommy]

And if you say it enough people might actually start believing it. Not this person though.

Funny how these republicans mentioned in this article are backed by the tea party which is NOT A THIRD PARTY.

Try as you might you cannot convince me it is a third party or any other person who is smart.

the funny thing you seem to keep hammering on is that it is, in fact, not a third party. Yes they back conservative to ultra conservative Republicans, primarily because the party can be changed a lot easier than trying to get federal monies and notoriety to begin an additional party, in a well entrenched two party system. Their planning has worked to the end goal of changing the political structure back to the right, ousted incumbents all over the country with the same system, and they have never claimed it to be the starting point to a third party. there is no single leader of the idea. there is no main office. there is barely a loosely fitted organization and communication network setup, and anything that happens comes from the labor of love of regional members calling around and making pland with other regional members. it is one true grass roots organization, that without proper future planning, will burn itself out because the body needs a head to bring it all together and keep it focused. I'm not talking about the RNC either, because they would only ruin what was started! if anything, it is more like a PAC or lobby group.

[Saggy]

I believe that our elections are less than who we vote FOR---and more for who we vote AGAINST. A protest vote, if you will. Our choices are few and our knowledge of candidates is purposely limited as kind of a disguise. WE ALL KNOW AND BELIEVE POLITICIANS CAN'T BE TRUSTED---Have you seen where the People rate them? Below a used car salesman.
Check it out yourselves. How about that dude you've never heard of; way down there on the ballot running for some local office we didn't even know existed. Where do you put your mark?

The big parties----Dems and Repubs---know this----and have known this for many decades. Their "colors" and "symbols" are to guide those that really don't know the candidate or would pay more attention to the "Buffys" on TV rather than the fewer and farther between Debates.
On second thought---those supposed "Debates" are pretty close to worthless too. Too many really stupid questions (from a supposedly non-biased Monitor) asked of the potentially BIG POWERFUL candidates and way too few positive or negative detailed answers. Generalities and hypotheticals should not accepted.. Also it should NOT be "will you debate?" It should be "you WILL debate and on a regular schedule" maybe 3 to 4 times and you will be graded on your answers.

Nothing wrong with this----it's basically all we've got until some giant group of non-partisan folks---like the League of Women Voters used to be---can put out expanded and better---if not detailed---info on each and every candidate.