One of our candidates’ primary pitch is forcing universal wearing of masks, “I would insist that everybody in public be wearing that mask. Masks save lives (dramatic pause for effect, pointing finger) P-E-R-I-O-D.”
Here’s a guess — the study will be published after 11/3/2020.Why not just conduct a randomized controlled trial to test whether masks work against COVID-19? Why assume such a draconian and dehumanizing mandate works as if it's an article of faith and create such division when we can discover which side is correct? That's what a group of Danish researchers felt, which is why, over the spring, they conducted such a study. So why have the results not been published, three months later? According to one Danish newspaper, the study has been rejected by three medical journals because the results are too controversial...
The researcher involved told the Berlingske, "The study and its size are unique in the world, and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of masks in public space provides protection against corona infection."...
The CDC, prior to changing its position on universal mask-wearing, had previously cited 10 randomized controlled trials that showed "no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks." Now, the CDC and other elite institutions would have us believe that coronavirus is somehow different. The Danes were the first to actually study the effect of large-scale universal mask-wearing specifically against the spread of COVID-19...
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horow...masks-rejected
http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arch...ical-journals/