Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Joe Biden Has Been A Chi-Com Shill For Decades

  1. #1
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387

    Joe Biden Has Been A Chi-Com Shill For Decades

    Now, as it has become obvious to even casual current affairs observers, that the Chinese Communists have elevated to our #1 threat and challenge, it is far past time to evaluate the credentials of those who would lead us to confront or acquiesce to that menace, or even if they consider it a menace.

    Joe Biden has a long history in his role as either chair or ranking member of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee or as Vice President in overseeing our relations with the Chi-Com’s. What he said and did in those roles should be most relevant. A close examination of Joe’s long record will reveal him as almost the Red Chinese sponsor in the Senate and later as Vice President.

    ...this is a man who sat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for three decades. Biden ultimately chaired or served as its ranking member from 1997 on, during a career at the senior-most levels of government spanning almost the entirety of U.S.-China engagement. As a longtime senator and then vice president, Biden never once acted to scuttle the integrationist-accommodationist policy that has left America in such a perilous position.

    This is to say nothing of the disturbing appearance of corruption surrounding Biden’s tenure as vice president, in which he managed the “China portfolio,” while his son Hunter contemporaneously entered into an apparent sweetheart Chinese investment deal (in which the Chi-Com’s invested at least $1,500,000,000 in Hunter’s months-old brand new investment firm, an endeavor into which he had zero experience and despite Hunter’s longstanding and well-known addiction to crack cocaine)...
    The quote above is from a cogent article proposing 23 questions Joe should be asked by interviewers on his plans for his administration for Chine relations —

    https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/29...r-about-china/

    As Vice President Biden has left a traceable track record with regard to our primary opponent —

    In 2011 Biden made a speech in China at Sichuan University in which he said —

    “I believed in 1979 and said so and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China but for the United States and the world as a whole.”

    “In order to cement this robust partnership, we have to go beyond close ties between Washington and Beijing, which we’re working on every day, go beyond it to include all levels of government, go beyond it to include classrooms and laboratories, athletic fields and boardrooms.”

    “…that’s why it’s also important that our military leaders work together, get to know one another — not just our political leaders, but our military leaders.”

    Biden takes this reckless approach to the private sector, too:

    “The United States should undertake to make it easier for Chinese businesspeople to obtain visas to travel to the United States. It takes much too long for that to happen.”

    During the 50-minutes he spoke, Biden expressed support for granting China increased access to high-tech U.S. products:

    “Already, we have made thousands of new items available for export to China for exclusive civilian use that were not available before, and tens of thousands of more items will become available very soon. That’s a significant change in our export policy and a rejection of those voices in America that say we should not export that kind of technology to – for civilian use in – China. We disagree, and we’re changing.”

    https://thenationalpulse.com/news/bi...us-government/

    After being called on his son getting unprecedented investment from the Chi-Com’s after Biden trolled him through Beijing, Joe is on video with this response, “ Come on, man, I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what, they’re not competition for us.”

    I would like to know if Joe’s opinion of Zi and the Chi-Com’s that “they are not bad folks” has changed since they locked down their cities, yet freed their infected to seed the rest of the world with their pestilence?

    Joe’s other and many shortcomings pale to insignificance next to his long history of shilling for the Red Chinese. There is one overriding and glaring difference between President Donald Trump and ex-VP Joe Biden — Trump is and has been a consistent opponent of the Red Chinese, and Joe Biden is and has been a consistent shill for the Red Chinese.

    We need to know if Sino-Joe is going to keep the record former Obama Defense Secretary Bob Gates identified when he said of Biden, “I think he [Biden] has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.”
    Last edited by wacojoe; 05-29-2020 at 12:30 PM.
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  2. #2
    Join Date
    10-22-01
    Location
    All Over
    Posts
    38,191
    Ah---you must have been off on an ammo search---good to have you back
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
    "Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
    “You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    11-14-01
    Location
    Apache Junction, AZ
    Posts
    25,675
    I think he was busy fact checking all the details, Dave.
    Fred

    "Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've
    stayed alive."

    'Take care of yourself, and each other.'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    01-21-04
    Location
    Crescent City CA. where the redwoods meet the sea.
    Posts
    15,119
    Are we suppose to fact check, hell I just babble so please don't.
    Old redneck hillbilly borned and raised on a redwood stump.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    10-20-02
    Location
    16 miles west of the White House, Northern Virginia..
    Posts
    4,529
    Wowzers.. well written.. but it may be a moot point.. The President's temper/ego may give the election away.

    Just my openion, I could be wrong.

    I do need to re-read the above and find "the twist"..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    04-29-17
    Posts
    7,516
    I think you had it pretty right Joe that's why the jokesters really didn't have much of a comeback
    OPINION....a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    10-30-01
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    30,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
    The President's temper/ego may give the election away.
    Yes. Let's make certain of that.

    Hunter
    I don't care if it hurts. I want to have control. I want a perfect body. I want a perfect soul. - Creep by Radiohead

  8. #8
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387
    Do not confuse being an asshat with being a Chi-Com stooge. If you cannot discern the importance of the difference in the coming age, you should seriously reconsider your imperatives.
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  9. #9
    Join Date
    10-22-01
    Location
    All Over
    Posts
    38,191
    It can't go ignored that China has been given "favored nation" status both formally and informally back to Nixon and every President since. They provided a great stabilizing factor on our economy by limiting inflation. One President after another were more than willing to give away long term security for short term political gains--China and Walmart kept the masses calm.
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
    "Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
    “You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis

  10. #10
    Join Date
    10-30-01
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    30,645
    Things could have turned out much worse. However, Nixon and Kissinger worked toward putting in place an economic war rather than a "hot" one. Their success should not be overlooked or minimized. They saw the writing on the wall - and acted appropriately.

    Hunter
    I don't care if it hurts. I want to have control. I want a perfect body. I want a perfect soul. - Creep by Radiohead

  11. #11
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387
    Quote Originally Posted by UTAH View Post
    Things could have turned out much worse. However, Nixon and Kissinger worked toward putting in place an economic war rather than a "hot" one. Their success should not be overlooked or minimized. They saw the writing on the wall - and acted appropriately.

    Hunter
    We must take into account that the Nixon/Kissinger era (1966-74) of dealing with the Chinese Communists was in the midst of the reign of Mao Zedong (croaked 1976), the fanatical instigator and absolute ruler of the Chi-Com regime, who had killed untold millions establishing his rule and then starved to death 30 million more in his “Great Leap Forward” plan only to replace that with his “Cultural Revolution” (1966-1976), which demanded total slavery to communist ideology and featured widespread mob enforced death squads publicly murdering or shaming intellectuals and other achievers to bring the masses into line and teach them absolute fealty to communism was their only path...which it did spectacularly well. Nixon and others in succeeding ranks operated on the proposition that if we (the West) welcomed them into the world’s economy that they would “see the light” of peaceful benefit of common trade and intercourse or be beguiled by it into changing their spots. They should have known better, as the Cultural Revolution abomination was in full swing during the Nixon years and only ended in 1976 with the welcome death of its hideous perpetrator. There was zero chance Mao was ever going to see the light of free market power or be enticed by it except to take advantage of it, as his successors have done.

    Instead, it was the West that was beguiled into accepting a ravenous tiger into our midst, which has lied, cheated and stolen its way to the top of the world economy, while we have put ourselves in its thrall for what first were mere trinkets, then dependence on vital core products. The CCP has not so much changed its spots as it has hidden them only to come out occasionally when it imprisons a few million Uyghurs, or crushes Tibet, or harvests organs from live prisoners for sale, or boards up WuHan Virus suffers until they die, or “disappears” doctors warning of the virus, quarantining tens of millions of its own citizen while send infected all over the world, or steals wholesale trade secrets, or is suppressing and subjugating a free Hong Kong against their treaty to not do so.

    As I see it, there are two paths to follow with regard to Red China — (A) accept the current status quo and trajectory of increased reliance with eventual subservience in critical resources & functions of our society, or (B) chart a path away from China control of critical resources and rebuild our own. Any cursory examination of the well documented history of the two current protagonists in our political story, Joe Biden vrs. Donald Trump, will tell you which is offering you A and which is offering B. At the core of our political divide are those on one side who believe that individuals exist to serve government (this would most assuredly contain the CCP), and those who believe government exists to serve individuals. I think these two candidates exemplify that difference whatever their other frailties. Upon that difference should a choice be made because that is the difference in the direction their administration will point and lead.

    Here’s some more entre into that history for those willing to look —

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...candidate.html

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ith_china.html

    https://thenationalpulse.com/coronav...n-china-trade/

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bide...d-david-bossie
    Last edited by wacojoe; 05-31-2020 at 11:32 AM.
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  12. #12
    Join Date
    10-22-01
    Location
    All Over
    Posts
    38,191
    Quote Originally Posted by wacojoe View Post
    We must take into account that the Nixon/Kissinger era (1966-74) of dealing with the Chinese Communists was in the midst of the reign of Mao Zedong (croaked 1976), the fanatical instigator and absolute ruler of the Chi-Com regime, who had killed untold millions establishing his rule and then starved to death 30 million more in his “Great Leap Forward” plan only to replace that with his “Cultural Revolution” (1966-1976), which demanded total slavery to communist ideology and featured widespread mob enforced death squads publicly murdering or shaming intellectuals and other achievers to bring the masses into line and teach them absolute fealty to communism was their only path...which it did spectacularly well. Nixon and others in succeeding ranks operated on the proposition that if we (the West) welcomed them into the world’s economy that they would “see the light” of peaceful benefit of common trade and intercourse or be beguiled by it into changing their spots. They should have known better, as the Cultural Revolution abomination was in full swing during the Nixon years and only ended in 1976 with the welcome death of its hideous perpetrator. There was zero chance Mao was ever going to see the light of free market power or be enticed by it except to take advantage of it, as his successors have done.

    Instead, it was the West that was beguiled into accepting a ravenous tiger into our midst, which has lied, cheated and stolen its way to the top of the world economy, while we have put ourselves in its thrall for what first were mere trinkets, then dependence on vital core products. The CCP has not so much changed its spots as it has hidden them only to come out occasionally when it imprisons a few million Uyghurs, or crushes Tibet, or harvests organs from live prisoners for sale, or boards up WuHan Virus suffers until they die, or “disappears” doctors warning of the virus, quarantining tens of millions of its own citizen while send infected all over the world, or steals wholesale trade secrets, or is suppressing and subjugating a free Hong Kong against their treaty to not do so.

    As I see it, there are two paths to follow with regard to Red China — (A) accept the current status quo and trajectory of increased reliance with eventual subservience in critical resources & functions of our society, or (B) chart a path away from China control of critical resources and rebuild our own. Any cursory examination of the well documented history of the two current protagonists in our political story, Joe Biden vrs. Donald Trump, will tell you which is offering you A and which is offering B. At the core of our political divide are those on one side who believe that individuals exist to serve government (this would most assuredly contain the CCP), and those who believe government exists to serve individuals. I think these two candidates exemplify that difference whatever their other frailties. Upon that difference should a choice be made because that is the difference in the direction their administration will point and lead.

    Here’s some more entre into that history for those willing to look —

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...candidate.html

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ith_china.html

    https://thenationalpulse.com/coronav...n-china-trade/

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bide...d-david-bossie
    Other than not agreeing with the links and any suggestion that trump is a competent President---uncharacteristically---I can find nothing of substance in that post to argue about.
    Last edited by Dave Grubb; 05-31-2020 at 02:35 PM.
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
    "Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
    “You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis

  13. #13
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387
    Exceptional article about the threat to the U.S. from a predatory Red China. He (Chinese-American author of many books on China relations) argues to recognize that Zi declared war on us April 2019 and we must respond by cutting them off —

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...hat-we-must-do
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  14. #14
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387
    One of Biden’s chief “Never Trumper” Republican supporters is disclosed as a Chi-Com lobbyist whose company is festooned with actual Chi-Com’s. Fits right in with Joe’s posture with the Reds.

    https://thenationalpulse.com/news/bi...william-cohen/
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  15. #15
    Join Date
    11-22-03
    Location
    In the Village...
    Posts
    43,951
    And the band played on......Ben
    The future is forged on the anvil of history...The interpreter of history wields the hammer... - Unknown author...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •