Originally Posted by
CactusCurt
I've been watching them for a couple weeks now. They have different numbers than the NYT and Johns Hopkins. They are all pretty close so I think its a data entry thing
They do have some interesting metrics, but as things stand now its still bs carried to 8 decimal places IMO.
I have to agree---at least in some of these statistics. One such "statistics" is the number of cases---we only know (possibly) how many have tested positive or were symptomatic and sought medical treatment. However, they keep saying that many (who knows the number) have had it and been asymptomatic. How many more self treated at home without medical intervention?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
"Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
“You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis