I kept waiting and waiting

[Honda]

Then I waited more...............on the BOMBSHELL the Dems were probing and begging for from Mueller. Then Damn..............there was nothing..........nothing. On to the next investigation. The brewhaha over his taxes will be next......this is starting to get fun watching the Dems wallow in their own desperation.

[wacojoe]

Mueller was a mental cripple exposed over an excruciating morning & afternoon. He obviously had little to nothing to do with an investigation and report executed by his team of 19 Hillary zealots in his name, yet even given an unlimited budget, 50 like-minded FBI investigators, 2800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses to intimidate & threaten could come up with zilch, zero, nada on Trump. Humiliating for the D’rat team who promised so much. The sad clown did not even know what Fusion GPS is and how it figured in what he was supposedly investigating. I have no sympathy for him or his ilk.

The next shoes to drop will be the Inspector General Horowitz’ report, then the DOJ investigation on the Who, Why & How this farce initiated and propagated.

It ain’t over ‘till it’s over, folks. The next parts are going to be fun.

[Honda]

Ok I get it. The Dems will do anything no matter how shameless to win in 2020. Politics is a rough game. But do you think they could slow down just a minute...........a single minute to legislate and do something for the country........anything...there are so many problems with health care, infrastructure and immigration. Could Pelosi hold off the dogs for just a session or two to get something done. Pipe dream, I know. AND just wait........Trumps personal finances will be next. They want to get him in Court real bad. I don't always agree with Trump on many things but there is one thing I will give him. He is one tough SOB.

[UTAH]

It's odd to hear this rejoicing of some of our members when Mueller did NOT exonerate Trump, and, said Trump could face future prosecution for his acts.

Hunter

[Honda]

It's odd to hear this rejoicing of some of our members when Mueller did NOT exonerate Trump, and, said Trump could face future prosecution for his acts.

Hunter

Wasn't his job to exonerate Trump. It was his job to find crimes and prosecute. That's the whole deal here. Prosecutors do not find ways to exonerate they find ways to prosecute. Otherwise every defendant that is not prosecuted would carry a veil of guilt which is exactly what you are doing. In essence you are saying since he was not exonerated he is not cleared. Well I don't think I am making too far of a stretch here but Trump will never be prosecuted for anything to do with Russia. In our country we are investigated and charged or investigated and not charged. If not charged it's over..........done. Further it is far beyond the purview of a special prosecutor to opine as to what can happen after his job is done. As far as rejoicing I won't do that until the dysfunction in DC is abated. So I don't see me doing that anytime soon.

[Phillbo]

It's all political mental masturbation....why bother watching?

[wacojoe]

It's odd to hear this rejoicing of some of our members when Mueller did NOT exonerate Trump, and, said Trump could face future prosecution for his acts.

Hunter

“To Exonerate” is the same as “Proving The Negative” or “Excluding All Possibility Of Guilt,” which are logical impossibilities in vitally all circumstances. In other words, those demanding an exoneration are expecting an impossibility as their standard.

I was a prosecutor for years and never exonerated anyone nor smeared anyone I declined to prosecute by announcing they were not exonerated. To do the later would be the zenith of unethical prosecutorial conduct. Had I done so, I would undoubtedly have been justifiably fired that day and probably been disbarred.

[Honda]

“To Exonerate” is the same as “Proving The Negative” or “Excluding All Possibility Of Guilt,” which are logical impossibilities in vitally all circumstances. In other words, those demanding an exoneration are expecting an impossibility as their standard.

I was a prosecutor for years and never exonerated anyone nor smeared anyone I declined to prosecute to announcing they were not exonerated. To do the later would be the zenith of unethical prosecutorial conduct. Had I done so, I would undoubtedly have been justifiably fired that day and probably been disbarred.

I think you just said about exactly what I said before whatever reason you don't want to acknowledge I said anyting. But that's okay you old heads like to stick together