Charter Member
Sadly for mayhem wishers, Pence has issued a rebuke and denial of the theory that he is the author. The same rabble who insist that Kavanaugh’s Mexican Jewess law clerk is also a white supremacist because of the way she holds her fingers will not be convinced though because they wish it so.
...............
“You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution
Registered Member
Hey,Hey, I'm with her. While reading your post, I happened to look down and saw that while my right hand was using my remote mouse, my left was resting on the keyboard shelf and was in the same position as the ladies hand was at the hearing. WOW I'm a White Supremacist. Whooda thunk it.
Guest
All of this nonsense only stands to affirm what Trump has said from the beginning, we need to drain the swamp. In this case it is quite obvious that the swamp is the over paid, under worked circus of a Congress, that can not even come together and do their Fu*7ing jobs. They are so used to playing politics, they can no longer work or work together especially. In my world, you can't work, you can't stay. Get the hell out of the peoples houses you ignorant assholes.
Charter Member
Oh my---I guess that must mean it is so-----surely the man would not deny the factOriginally Posted by wacojoe
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
"Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
“You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis
Charter Member
Pence would never in a thousand years give the NYTs a blackmail card on himself, then add to it with a phony denial. He despises those people, and they him.
...............
“You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution
Charter Member
There is more than one way to become President---not to mention the old saying about politics and bedfellows.
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity, an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty” ---Sir Winston Churchill
"Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." ---John W. Gardner
“You can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and change the ending.” ---C. S. Lewis
Charter Member
Quote from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...sistance-op-edWe'll know more soon enough. The Times wrote that it granted the author anonymity because his "job would be jeopardized" by disclosure of his name. It seems hard to believe the author truly thinks he can remain anonymous — and keep his job — in the white-hot public attention his article will attract. One way or the other, his identity will likely come out, probably sooner rather than later. And then the story could become even more interesting.
Fred
"Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've
stayed alive."
'Take care of yourself, and each other.'
Charter Member
There’s an old Dusty Springfield song that fits your emotions — Wishin' and hopin' and thinkin' and prayin'
Plannin' and dreamin'...
Keep it up, Dave, there’s always hope...
...............
“You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution
Registered Member
right? geez
Registered Member
hah, these are his ppl
Charter Member
Sure got Trump in a rage.
To bad he doesn't know the 1st amendment.
Fred
"Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've
stayed alive."
'Take care of yourself, and each other.'
Registered Member
lol... "turn him over to government"
Charter Member
Did notice Rudy's been silent.............
Fred
"Everyday I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've
stayed alive."
'Take care of yourself, and each other.'
Registered Member
I could be wrong and I will say that up front but when the author is revealed if ever it will be a vast disappointment......................
OPINION....a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Guest
Well it will not be the first time the Times got caught in a huge kerfluffel of a lie.
President Trump should probably call off the hunt for the “senior official in the...administration" who the New York Times is claiming wrote a damning op-ed for the newspaper.
Apparently the “senior official” claims to be part of a group of White House staff trying to thwart the president’s agenda from within. He also claims they seriously considered trying to depose the president using the 25th amendment of the Constitution.
Serious stuff. But President Trump should relax and remember it is the New York Times after all. The paper has a scandalous history of lying about the seniority of officials it quotes anonymously - especially when that source parrots their agenda......
A few years back they were caught red-handed deceiving their readers in such a way.
In a lengthy anti-fracking article they claimed that senior industry experts and insiders believed the industry to be little more than a “Ponzi scheme" ... "set up for failure".
They even had the emails from a series of senior insiders where these doubts were expressed.
According to the New York Times, one “energy analyst” wrote, “Am I just totally crazy, or does it seem like everyone and their mothers are endorsing shale gas without getting a really good understanding of the economics at the business level?”
Another “federal analyst” said in an industry email, “It seems that science is pointing in one direction and industry PR is pointing in another.”
Well unfortunately for the New York Times, the emails were from the Energy Information Agency - a government organization - so this meant Senate investigators were able to find the original emails and work out the identity of all these different senior experts. It turns out the federal analyst, the energy analyst and the officer turned out to be the same person who was actually an intern when he wrote the first email and in an entry level position when he wrote the other comments. Yes, that’s right, the “Paper of Record" misrepresented an intern/junior employee as a senior official to push an agenda.
Was the New York Times embarrassed when their deception was uncovered? The Senate investigation did attract the attention of the New York Times Public Editor Arthur S Brisbane. “Can an intern be an “official”? It doesn’t sound right to me,” he stated.
Well it sounded fine to the New York Times editorial board. They stood by their mislabelling of the intern/low level employees as a senior official. They later decided they didn’t want their stories to be second guessed in their own newspaper so they ended the role of public editor in the newspaper. And the reporter who misrepresented the intern, well, he was promoted. Ian Urbina is now a New York Times “investigative reporter based in Washington.” Maybe part of that investigation involved finding someone to write anti-Trump anonymous op/eds posing as a “senior official in the Trump administration.”
President Trump is probably wondering who the anonymous official is. Perhaps given the New York Times's history of dissembling in this regard he should take his eyes off the cabinet table and wander down to whatever part of the White House holds the interns.
https://townhall.com/columnists/phel...cials-n2516340
But then again, the left does not want truth, they want revenge. Unfortunately for them, the other people do not buy into their lies and BS. Sure it inflames their base, but then again, many of those are not the sharpest tools in the shed.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote