Whistleblower Exposing Stefan Halper Retaliated Against By Deep State

[wacojoe]

This episode is convoluted but vital to the understanding of the Trump/Russia collusion concoction. Essentially the bureaucrat whose job it was to check expenses and connections of security expenditures noticed something funny for $1 million paid to an FBI contractor, Stefan Halper, doing worker partly proscribed by law. He also found similar work being done by an unnamed “close associate” of the Clintons. After notifying superiors of the strange and illegal work and payments he was stripped of his security clearances, demoted and subsequently fired without explanation.

The article explores much more of the Halper connections with his own deep participation’s with the Russians than those (Flynn, Page, Papadopoulos) he has set up and accused of improprieties. A lot to answer for here by the FBI, CIA and the Deep State apparatus.

https://saraacarter.com/whistleblowe...-all-a-set-up/

[Dave Grubb]

Let me know when you have something "defensible"----frankly, that is so poorly written the entire story begins to smell.

[wacojoe]

Pealing back the layers of the onion one at a time. The latest layer to be exposed is a report that the “(t)he Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to (China)” after a program was embedded in her server before she became Sec. of State and actively forwarded all but 4 of her emails thereafter in real time. These included emails discussing our spies, agents and plants around the world. After discovering the planted program in 2015, the ICIG had multiple meetings with top FBI officials including Peter Strzok and relayed that information, but received a collective shrug of the shoulders. Strzok denied any such knowledge in his recent testimony in Congress.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/c...linton-server/
http://www.independentsentinel.com/s...-in-real-time/

Just keeping you informed so you will know when to continue

[Dave Grubb]

I read that same story in Sputniknews -----does this mean we get to see all the lost emails?

[wacojoe]

If you are keeping up, you also read that Strzok was in charge of the “investigation” of Carlos Danger’s seized laptop and though swearing to the press shortly before the election along with Mr. Truth & Light, James Comey, that his overworked team labored night & day to read all 694,000 emails stored on it, and did so. Now we learn that the team only really reviewed 3077 emails carefully selected by - wait for it! - Peter Strzok!!! If you were paying attention, and I’m sure you are, you will have filled in the blanks and remember that HerSelf only turned over 30,000 emails, while claiming she destroyed 30,000 others which she claimed were personal pertaining to weddings and yoga classes and such. You’re ahead of me now, right? If there were ~700,000 emails on Anthony Weiner’s Computer and she only turned over 30k to State and Justice, what are the other emails on Weiner’s computer, were there any of HRC’s missing ones there and when are they going to be disclosed fully? Yep, the missing emails most likely are there too, which is why only 3500 or 0.0044% of innocuous ones were paraded out when it counted and the issue was declared dead.

So, we do not have to go to the Chinese or the Russians, Iranians, NORKs, French, Brits or whomever else has them, we have them right here on Carlos’s old computer along with his communications with children everywhere. Should be fun reading...

https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/0...laptop-emails/

[Dave Grubb]

When I look at a list of stories resulting from a search and all are of similar tilt I get cautious--be they right or left leaning. In this case they went one step further into the land of caution---they all use the same "secondhand source", the Daily Caller.
I have limited time to piss away and that is one bucket I'll pass on until it finds a broader footing.

[wacojoe]

Just trying to keep you ahead of the curve, and this is what I get.

[Dave Grubb]

Just trying to keep you ahead of the curve, and this is what I get.

I appreciate your concern sir and meant no insult to you

[Billy_Rightwing]

Now were back to Hillary again?

[Wannabe]

Now were back to Hillary again?

All roads lead to Rome Billy.

[Dave Grubb]

Pealing back the layers of the onion one at a time. The latest layer to be exposed is a report that the “(t)he Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to (China)” after a program was embedded in her server before she became Sec. of State and actively forwarded all but 4 of her emails thereafter in real time. These included emails discussing our spies, agents and plants around the world. After discovering the planted program in 2015, the ICIG had multiple meetings with top FBI officials including Peter Strzok and relayed that information, but received a collective shrug of the shoulders. Strzok denied any such knowledge in his recent testimony in Congress.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/c...linton-server/
http://www.independentsentinel.com/s...-in-real-time/

Just keeping you informed so you will know when to continue

That has been refuted by the FBI---and I am going with the FBI.

[wacojoe]

^^^
I don’t know why anyone privy to the news would “go with the FBI” at this stage after the revelations of their perfidies, but I’ll provide my response to this same issue in a thread in “politics” started by Fred.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I would hasten to point out the articles this week do not attribute the “discovery” of a trail of a Chinese Trojan Horse program left in Hillary’s computer to FBI computer experts, but to those in a completely different bureaucracy, the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), and investigator Frank Rucker and attorney Janette McMillan specifically who are said to have repeatedly notified higher-ups in the FBI of that discovery only to have them ignore it. If true, that revelation is a gross indictment of the FBI. I would expect them to stonewall this charge as they have done many other charges and demands for information and papers.

Observers will note that Hillary directed her people to destroy her devices and data (while under Congressional subpoena!) such that the FBI could not access or test it, when they became active in the case in 2016, and the FBI could justifiably then say they have no evidence. The articles concerning the ICIG revelations indicate they did have prior access in 2015 to the devices and data to test before destruction and concealment, which yielded their conclusions of Chinese penetration. Both bureaus could be correct in their assertions, i.e., the FBI could find nothing because they did not have either the devices or metadata, and the ICIG could because they had access to both. But, even if that be the case, it would not justify the FBI ignoring the ICIG’s warning. Note, the FBI did not say there was no penetration, only that they had no evidence of one, but of course they would have no evidence because Hillary had any possible evidence destroyed before the FBI, dragging their heels all the way, looked into the matter.

As of now, the story remains unsubstantiated and only time and some hearings with ICIG personnel will tell.

Sadly, FBI press denials have come to mean zip.

[Dave Grubb]

I do not ascribe to the prevailing belief among the Trump sheeple and the hard right that everything connected to government and not touched by Trump is evil. Are there "bad" people in the FBI, yes. Are there bad people in the DOJ. the CIA, NSA et al---yes. They have one thing in common---they are composed of human beings and human beings are not all perfect. However, by far the vast majority are honest hard working people that are trying to do a professional job. This constant banter from Trump is not only dishonest on the face of it, it is corrosive to our entire society---and government agencies.

It is a sad commentary that some low life creep can demean perfectly good people and institutions and the sheeple wonder around after him.

[wacojoe]

If, as alleged in this China penetration of Hillary’s computer story, the FBI was informed numerous times, and did nothing, would you still refer to those gross failures as “demeaning perfectly good people?” Dave, why would you deflect this episode back to what Trump thinks of it, when the story of the FBI’s failures has nothing to do with Trump, but everything about how the FBI granted Hillary a pass in the face of overwhelming evidence of her felonies? This set of facts, if true, has nothing to do with Trump.

[Dave Grubb]

---your word---alleged.

It's alleged Trump told the truth about something once---but that doesn't mean it's true