Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Hearings with Strzok

  1. #1
    Join Date
    10-20-03
    Posts
    15,885

    Hearings with Strzok

    I listened to a few hours of the hearings yesterday while I was driving and came to the conclusion that the swamp is much deeper than we thought. The way the actual members talked to each other and the Chair, so disrespectful, it was apparent that it was nothing but a circus. The Dems brought up their same old song about Russian collusion and could not see the glaring bias that Strzok showed.


    The Repubs tried to stick to the main body, which was the texts themselves and what he was talking about as far as "we will stop him" and who all was involved in this charade of the FBI.


    Personally, I do not see how anybody could say that he and his cohorts were not biased, that would be like me trying to say that I was not biased against liberals, it just would not fly. Where you say that you could SMELL the Trump voters, it shows a bias. When you call a man names, it shows bias, plain and simple. When you admit that you are working to stop a person from doing something, it shows bias.


    I do not care which side of the aisle one stand on, left or right, or even squarely in the middle....if the line separating the sides is not set in the same spot for everybody, we all lose. I have come out many times saying that if a Repub is guilty of something, show them the door or a jail cell. You cross the line, you do the time, but these Congressmen and women have no clue as to what is even right or wrong anymore. When the leaders of a Country can not hold everyone accountable to the same rules, it is time form them to be removed, forcibly if necessary.


    That whole charade was nothing but joke, a very sick one. If this is what our politics have sunk into then something needs to be done quickly.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    01-21-04
    Location
    Crescent City CA. where the redwoods meet the sea.
    Posts
    15,119
    They acted like a bunch of kids. They can't agree on what questions to ask and that bozo didn't know the answer to any of them.
    Old redneck hillbilly borned and raised on a redwood stump.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    10-21-01
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    18,387
    It occurs to me that an investigator being prejudiced and harboring Ill will toward a target has never been a disqualifier out of hand. I posit that nearly every investigator and prosecutor involved in cases targeting the mob came into the job very prejudiced against them. I guess one big difference is that we know the mob and it’s members are guilty of everything, but that axiom does not apply to political opponents...does it?

    I could tell stories of my own experiences of being very prejudiced against known criminals when I was a prosecutor.
    Last edited by wacojoe; 07-14-2018 at 12:55 AM.
    ...............
    “You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.” — Too fundamental to have an attribution


  4. #4
    Join Date
    10-20-03
    Posts
    15,885
    But did you ever change or alter any of the evidence to sway either to or for? The problem is they were not looking for direct interference, they were actually trying to make it LOOK like something happened and then put it out to the news to sway public opinion. Not just against Trump , but against Hilliary and for her as well. They slapped her down for having an illegal server and then changed the wording so it would not be a criminal offense.


    I still do not get all of the Dems still flying that flag at the hearings of, the Russians helped Trump and he is trying to get Mueller fired. They have been saying that since it started and he is still there, sucking up the free taxpayer dollars. The stupid thing about it, and if they would just shut up long enough to listen to themselves, Hilliary won the popular vote. The one that mattered was the electoral vote. How could the Russians have swayed the electoral vote to a degree that he would win both popular as will as electoral? That is literally as close to impossible as one could get with the millions of people voting.


    The FBI was acting in a way that was wrong, for such a highly rated LEO organization. That has been affirmed by more than one investigation and the reports released. It has cost Comey as well as his 2nd in command their jobs and possibly criminal charges. That is incredible to me, and then these same people are supposed to be trusted in another investigation relating to the same basic thing?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    04-29-17
    Posts
    7,546
    Peter strzok was nothing more than a partisan hack operating in the FBI at the pleasure of the Department of Justice and fully sustained and supported by the Obama Administration. If you don't believe me just sit back and watch this play out
    OPINION....a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •