My company provides Life Partners benefits. No questions asked about sex of the partner. I've had Nurse Paula on my insurance for 18 years without having to be married.
So, IF we were a gay couple it would not be any different.
My company provides Life Partners benefits. No questions asked about sex of the partner. I've had Nurse Paula on my insurance for 18 years without having to be married.
So, IF we were a gay couple it would not be any different.
Cool so your company is one of the categories I mentioned. I suggest that you tell your CEO to go public with the companies policies. Fair game. My point is when this gets in the public domain it gets crazy and the companies are punished whatever side they are on.
Are you saying the Life Partner benefit is wrong ? I should have to get married to get the benefit?
In your eyes , you equate Life Partner with Gay Marriage. Why should the employer care (other than chic folay ) if you are married or not .. not their business.
Why should an employer care or even know who you are married too?
As usual you have totally hijacked the meaning of my post.........have a good time. I am out dude,
I can live with that... C ya.
BO you missed the whole point he was trying to make. The media creates the stir not the CEO. If the same question was asked of all other CEO's and they answered just think of the responses they would give.
As far as the insurance, if they cover you thats great. I have no problems with it. Now would you still feel the same if they "forced" you to marry in order to be covered?