Printable View
Finally the depth of corruption in Comey's FBI is coming to light. Read the motion to dismiss filed by the DOJ it is long but it is quite illuminating as to the corrupt ship Comey and his lackies were running.\
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dro...l-memo-release
That's so sad as he was offered a important job at the White House. Now maybe give him back pay, what are the libs up to next?
As I recall, trump fired him for lying to the VP. :shrug: Other than the obvious craziness in trump firing someone for doing what he does best---telling lies---it had nothing to do with any of the issues now being discussed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy_Rightwing
So we have two Liars running for president what's new.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Grubb
And at 9:02 p.m. which is after 9 I will announce that the FBI was full of nothing but sleazebags on the quote 7th floor
Well there you go again. You said "was". I say "is" and it is not just the 7th floor. Power corrupts and they have been given far too much power.Quote:
Originally Posted by Honda
If you have been paying attention here and elsewhere, the news of FBI/DOJ/Mueller malfeasance in the Gen. Flynn case is nothing new, nor are the “revelations” that none of the witnesses in the secret House hearings could lay a finger on Trump with any connections to Russia in the phony election theory despite the continual lies of Schiff to the contrary. Stay tuned, there are a lot more reveals to come on this pack of scum.
The significant impact of it all is that the D’rats and the swampies at their command knew from the getgo it was all crap but went ahead for years in order to hold the elected winner back. There should be serious prices to pay.
Think he admitted to lying, didn't he?
Flynn was first broken financially, then threatened with retaliation to be visited upon his son by all-powerful federal prosecutors after earlier being cleared by them only to have the investigation restarted after President Obama personally intervened. This is the definition of coercion by official oppression.Quote:
Originally Posted by FredK
And no, Fred, the charge is not “lying,” the charge to which he was coerced into a plea was “materially misleading a federal official in an official investigation.” The DOJ concluded there was no reasons to suspect an underlying crime thus there were no grounds for an investigation, therefore he could not have materially mislead what was illegal fishing expedition ab initio. In short, it was trumped up BS. (pun intended)
Your champion, Congressman Nadler the Hutt (D-Twilight Zone), has promised a hearing on the subject. You might want to catch that as Atty. Gen. Barr smothers the fool once again with facts in his usual droll but instructive manner.
Very eloquent councilor----but misses one important point.
The "good" general was (according to his boss) terminated for lying to the VP---period :shrug:
Hard to get past the irony in that one :pimpgrin:
You might want to consider that being fired and being convicted of a crime are two distinct things, and the crime charged had zip to do with communications with V.P. Pence. Btw, Pence says of that —
The firing of Flynn took place at a time when Trump ostensibly had some modicum of respect and trust in his Justice Department, unjustified as it turned out to be.Quote:
...Vice President Mike Pence said Thursday he is “inclined more than ever” to believe retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn did not intentionally mislead him about his conversations with a Russian envoy, which was a reason cited by President Trump for asking him to resign as national security adviser in early 2017...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-russian-envoy
I find it almost humorous that you would put such credence on anything said by either of trump's largest lap dogs :shrug:
I find it less than humorous that you are trying to find excuses for a series of gross abuses of power by the FBI/DOJ even after the facts have been exposed in reams of documents and admitted by the organization merely because you do not like the victims.
and now we get a new twist
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...riefs-n1205811
The the ninth Circuit of Appeals just tried that recently and the Supreme Court slam the door on them. We'll see how this one goesQuote:
Originally Posted by TriGuy