Seams the Dems want to go back 30 some odd years and slam Kavanaugh for excess drinking while in college.
How about we go back ten years and check out some Dems. Starting with the leader. https://www.wnd.com/2010/01/123472/
Printable View
Seams the Dems want to go back 30 some odd years and slam Kavanaugh for excess drinking while in college.
How about we go back ten years and check out some Dems. Starting with the leader. https://www.wnd.com/2010/01/123472/
Yet they loved Obama, who admitted to being a Stoner and snorting coke regularly. It is always something with those bunch of babies. They will never be happy so who cares, you just accept that and move on with what you were doing. The left has made themselves out to be irrelevant as they are going to protest any and all things that the Repubs do.
Good point! If being the leader of the “Choom Gang” and self-confessed serial drug user “of whatever was out there” as a teen does not disqualify for the presidency, why would “liking beer” as a young man or even today disqualify for a seat on SOCTUS?
https://perezhilton.com/2016-10-10-p...e-mtv-special/
Why would anyone care how much he drank as a youth? It's how much he drinks today that matters.
If subpoenaed, I can testify with a degree of expertise...:mypal:...BenQuote:
Originally Posted by Mike
Have not a problem with drinking. Lying is another matter.
Something on the order of, say, “If you want to keep your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you want to keep your insurance plan, you can keep your insurance plan?” Or, “I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski?”Quote:
Originally Posted by FredK
Im fairly sure it its about his honesty surrounding details of his youth, BECAUSE he was accused of sexual assault while drinking heavily. That if he, like Judge has admitted to drinking until blacking out, could have done the things he is accused of and got so drunk he doesn't remember them.
Usually when a person is raped at a party there are at least a couple of people that could testify that the accused rapist was even there. Sure the accused could have drank until blacking out, but it does not change the fact that not a single person confirms that he was even at said party. That is the point, no credible evidence verifying the story, if the group says he was there it may change things, but nobody has said they saw him there. Now if there were only a few....I'll say less than 10, people at this party, and 9 of them say that he was never there? What are the odds of that story being true?
Okay, 9 of them say he was partying like mad and snot slinging drunk, different story all together. Nine, NINE people did not see the guy at the same party? Does anybody else smell fish? I have drank until I passed out a few times, but anybody that was at the party knew and said I was there. I doubt that woman doing the accusing had enough pull to get the other people to agree with her story. Until her facts are verified in some way, I will call BS.
From the way the story was brought to the forefront, the hiding of the "Gotcha" story until the last minute and the way she sent it to a politician instead of a law enforcement officer, or at least mail the letter to the FBI, but to give it to the opposition party and a news outlet.....BS. Second, eithe she or her lawyer lied to everyone, when she said she was afraid to fly, yet it was disclosed that she flies all over the world, and had in fact flown just a few days prior to making that false statement? Third, who in the hell has to go to a therapist to settle a disagreement over wanting a second front door so that you can escape? It is just a bit much for my mind to buy. SHe is a whack job, granted something might have happened to her in her party days, but some guy grabbing a boob at a party did not do all of that.
Why has her behavior not been brought into question at the party? Maybe she was playing train and everyone got to grab a booby? Need to ask her how many other men "grabbed" her booby that night. Need to ask her if she was always on the bottom at these party's? While the man on top of you was grabbing your booby what were you grabbing? Being the obvious party girl how much did you like beer and how often did you wake up in a bed that wasn't yours?
Hey fairs fair, you want to play let's make it fun for the both of us, you know like in the old days.
Even here nobody will bring it up. Does that make us gentleman because we wouldn't think of bring it up? Or does it once again prove that we are continually being run over because of white guilt? Woman and minority's can say anything they want about the white man and the worst they get is dues paid to the "me too" brigade. Let a white man say the same thing even when it's true and you have to resign, quit your job, leave town or all three.
According to her, she has had 64 men.Quote:
Originally Posted by mgrist
Everything is always the mans fault, especially if the man is white. Several things that make it a bit of the young girls fault as well and she needs to accept responsibility for her own actions. First, she was 15, at a party where older boys were drinking alcohol, which she did the same. Second, the party was downstairs, not in the upstairs bedroom. Since she did not say that they had to drag her up there by her hair, one would assume she went willingly. Third, if she only had one drink, she should have seen what was coming or at least have heard what happens or what could happen in those situations. Alcohol plus teenagers and an unsupervised party equals a perfect storm for problems.
She should have reported the incident at the time it happened or at the very least the day after. Waiting 35 years and then letting yourself be "groped and used" by a political party that you back, does not make your story very credible to me. You were NOT raped and your virginity was intact when you left. Your breast was touched and you might have felt scared or humiliated but in the big picture you were extremely lucky. Why ruin another persons life to satisfy some personal urge? I could see a face to face confrontation with the man, maybe an email or a phone call, but to drag Congress into a meeting to bitch and whine about a teenage boob grab is so over the top of the "Look at me" train. It also backhands those female victims that were actually raped of physically assaulted while they were walking down the street or maybe going to the grocery store, not sneaking into a party where young boys and alcohol were. Grow up, get some counseling and leave the rest of the world out of your pity party.
I haven't had any where near 64 woman, enough to not even having a clue about how many it really was though. And she remembered? 64 men but didn't remember a boob grab??Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabe
^^^
That brings up an interesting point. As the cesspool was being drained this last week, the head of Michael Avanti popped up as it is want to do from such miasma, shouting that he dragged up a new client willing to swear that in the 80’s she attended serial gang rape parties, where she saw Kavanaugh in attendance. No one seems to remember such momentous events in that time and space though. It occurred to me that perhaps the best way to prove such events even happened would be to ask for a show of hands from area gynecologists practicing there at that time, as I presume such activity would leave patients needing their expertise after the “party.” The fact that none have raised their hands by now after wide publicity, indicates to me the charge is fantasy.