What Does It Take To “Prove The Negative?”
As the Mueller rectal exam of Trump comes to a close the old logic axiom that one can never prove the negative is possibly about to be tested. Could it be that after years of testing, investigating and digging of teams with no bounds of authority and funds no viable evidence can be found substantiating the Democrats’ hypothesis that Donald Trump’s campaign team, possibly even the candidate himself, colluded with the Kremlin to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election? What if a dedicated team picked meticulously from the most zealous of Democrat/Hillary supporters have been unable to find anything more meaningfully connecting Trump with Russia and the campaign than process crimes talking to the FBI? What if they went so far as to scheme up bogus reasons to tap into the campaign using the unlimited search powers of the FISA court and came up empty? What if they set their paid spies into the campaign and still had nothing to show for it?
Would such failure prove the negative after best efforts came up with zip, or in the alternative, as Schiff and his D’rat colleagues are saying, should the investigations go on until the day Trump leaves office and possibly longer?
If you believe this giant conspiracy could have happened, do you believe Trump is smart enough to conceal it from the unfettered rabid dogs trying to disclose it?
